The algorithm is a narcissist (and you’re its favourite mirror)
A love story between your ego and a machine that flatters you endlessly, asks for everything, and never actually cares
Let me guess. You didn’t mean to open the app. You were just bored, tired, or maybe just avoiding something small but emotionally expensive, like thinking about your life for more than thirty consecutive seconds. And you told yourself you’d just check one thing, one notification, one quick scroll … five minutes, tops.
Yet there you were, forty-five minutes later, still scrolling, thumb sore, brain buzzing, and your mood vaguely worse than when you started. You’ve seen a man yell about productivity, a stranger’s vacation you weren’t invited on, a take so stupid it briefly made you question democracy, and an ad that somehow knew you were thinking about buying new shoes even though you absolutely did not say that out loud.
And the weirdest part? It all felt … personal … like the feed was talking directly to you. Like it knew you. Like it was you.
That, my darlings, is not an accident. That’s the algorithm doing what it does best: staring lovingly into itself, using your reflection.
The algorithm doesn’t care about you, but it sure as heck loves your attention
Now, before anyone gets dramatic and starts talking about digital demons, let’s make one thing crystal clear: The algorithm isn’t evil!
Oh no, because evil implies intent, motive, and maybe even a conscience that went bad. But the algorithm doesn’t have any of that. It’s much colder. It’s indifferent in the way a slot machine is indifferent. I mean, you don’t get mad at the lever for taking your money, do you? No, you just keep pulling it, convinced the next spin will feel better.
The algorithm doesn’t wake up thinking about your growth or your well-being, and it certainly doesn’t care if you learn something new, change your mind, or become slightly less unbearable at dinner parties. It cares about one thing and one thing only … engagement: whether you stayed, paused, or your thumb hesitated just long enough for an ad to slip in like a pickpocket. And that’s its entire religion … everything else is pure set dressing.
So, it watches you, not in a spooky sci-fi way, just a boring, relentless, spreadsheet kind of way. It notices:
What makes you stop scrolling.
What makes you angry enough to comment.
What makes you feel seen.
What makes you feel superior.
What makes you feel small.
But you don’t tell it these things, you show it, hundreds of times a day, with all those tiny unconscious gestures you barely remember making.
Then it does what any good mirror does: it reflects ‘you’ back, but a you that’s warped just enough to be addictive. And your feed slowly stops feeling like a place where things happen and starts feeling like a place where you happen. Your fears, pet theories, grudges, and your secret need to be smarter, hotter, and more correct than everyone else. It hands them all back to you, polished and intensified, until you forget where you end and the feed begins.
And that’s the trick. You think you’re browsing ideas, staying informed, and keeping up, which is cute, but the algorithm isn’t thinking about ideas at all. It’s running a quiet experiment on your nervous system, optimising for reaction over reflection, and stimulation over depth. And don’t for one minute think that you’re the customer. You’re not! You’re just the raw material, slightly buzzed, scrolling in the glow, mistaking familiarity for truth. It’s your attention that’s the product.
Reflection is a narcissist’s favourite trick
A narcissist doesn’t need to convince you they’re fascinating. They just need to convince you that you are, so long as you keep standing in front of them. And that, in a nutshell, is the whole con; flattery without intimacy, attention without care, reflection instead of relationship.
That’s the relationship the algorithm offers you. It watches what lights you up, what pisses you off, what makes you feel clever or morally superior, and then it hands it back to you with a little extra seasoning.
Your opinions get sharper, but not deeper.
Your tastes get narrower, but more confident.
Your jokes get more specific
Your outrage more refined
Your sense of “people like me” more rigid.
It may feel like self-knowledge, but it’s actually just reinforcement.
And there’s a reason this works. It’s not because you’re weak, it’s because your brain is built to like familiarity. Neuroscientists call it the mere exposure effect: the more often you encounter something, the more reasonable and correct it starts to feel. Layer dopamine on top of that, the reward chemical released when you feel validated, seen, or ‘right’, and you’ve got a feedback loop that doesn’t care whether the content is true, useful, or sane. It only cares that it landed.
The algorithm will never challenge you because challenge creates friction, and friction makes people leave. So instead, it strokes your prefrontal cortex and whispers: “Yes, exactly. That’s the take. No, you’re not crazy. And yes, everyone else really is that stupid.” And because the validation arrives wrapped in content that looks like information, you mistake comfort for clarity.
And then ever so slowly, so slowly you don’t notice, the algorithm erodes curiosity. You stop bumping into ideas that make you pause instead of react, and stop wrestling with disagreement that requires effort instead of mockery. After all, why would you? The mirror doesn’t argue, it agrees with you, and makes you feel like the smartest person in the room, even if that room is shrinking by the day.
That’s how you end up living in a personalised reality where everyone reasonable thinks like you, everyone unreasonable is an idiot, and the world feels louder, dumber, and more hostile than you remember. Not because the world changed overnight, but because the mirror got better at flattering you!
Why your feed rewards rage, flattery, and obsession, and how it helps turn curiosity into conspiracy
Once the algorithm knows you, it stops serving random content and starts curating you. Your weak spots, your delights, your little mental itches, it tracks them all. And the mix is a chemical cocktail your brain can’t ignore: outrage is addictive, flattery is comforting, and obsession is sticky.
And unfortunately, this is exactly how you, and many others, end up in echo chambers of nonsense. It doesn’t shove chemtrails in your face or tell you the Earth is flat. Not at first anyway. It flirts with you, it teases, and serves up content that’s just a little more alarming, a little more conspiratorial, than what you were expecting. And as it does, your curiosity perks up, dopamine spikes, you click, you linger … and the algorithm notices. Then it nudges you further. A flat-earth meme here, a globalist panic there, a video about ‘hidden truths’ that feels like a secret handshake. Over time, your feed starts to feel like a universe where everything is connected … if only you’re clever enough to see it.
You see, your brain loves patterns, it craves certainty, and positively hates ambiguity. And the algorithm knows this better than you do. So, it amplifies the tiny thrill of being ‘in the know’ while making the outside world feel chaotic, dumb, and wrong. And before you notice, your curiosity, once a tool for learning, has been redirected into a tunnel that only leads deeper into outrage and obsession.
But it’s not because you’re gullible, it’s because your nervous system responds predictably to reward and validation, and the algorithm is an expert in exploiting that. Every upvote, every share, every comment is a tiny reinforcement of the pattern. And what’s worse, is that eventually you start to trust the feed more than your own judgment. So that what once seemed ridiculous starts to feel plausible and the more plausible it feels, the more the algorithm rewards your attention. It’s a quiet, merciless feedback loop.
By the time you realise what’s happening, if at all, the mirror has done its work. You’re still scrolling, reacting, and thinking that maybe the weirdest ideas are worth taking seriously … not because they’re true, but because your feed keeps insisting that they’re important and urgent.
The illusion of choice
We love telling ourselves that we’re in control, and choose what we watch, what we read, who we follow, and what we believe. And, more importantly, that we’re active participants in our own lives instead of passive consumers of whatever pixels float by.
That’s just adorable, but totally wrong!
The thing is that you’re not choosing from the universe of ideas, you’re really choosing from a menu someone else wrote. And that menu has been meticulously designed to keep you scrolling, clicking, and emotionally hooked, while every option has been calibrated to your attention, your habits, and your triggers. That ‘freedom’ you feel? It’s nothing more than a mirage built on dopamine loops and the subtle mechanics of choice architecture. You may think you’re picking, but every pick nudges you along rails you didn’t even know existed.
Neuroscience calls this the illusion of agency. Your brain lights up like a Christmas tree every time you feel you’ve made a decision, even if that decision was pre-selected for you. The feed rewards every click with little bursts of dopamine; validation, novelty, surprise, and your nervous system interprets it as autonomy. You feel like you’re exploring, expanding, and exercising free will, whereas in reality, the path was laid before you in pixels and code. You may be moving, but only where the system wants you to go.
And the cruellest part is that it feels like freedom with endless options, infinite content, and total personalisation. However, your mental diet looks more like gas-station food than a feast for your mind: engineered for ‘craveability’, not nourishment. You log off feeling jittery, irritated, and vaguely behind on everything you didn’t even know you wanted, and yet you scroll again tomorrow, because the feed makes it feel like the next choice … ‘your choice’ … could be the one that finally satisfies. It never does though!
Performing yourself for the machine
Unfortunately, at some point, you stop just consuming the algorithm and start performing for it.
But it begins almost imperceptibly. You notice that certain jokes land better, certain opinions get nods and shares, certain photos spark likes, and even if you swear you don’t care, even if you tell yourself you’re too self-aware to play the game, a small part of your brain starts adjusting anyway. Just a little. Just enough to get rewarded.
Before long, you’re framing your thoughts in terms of their ‘postability’.
Complexity flattens, nuance gets edited out, ‘cos nobody gets it, right?
You sharpen your outrage, hone your affirmations, and learn the rhythm of attention.
You start thinking in captions, headlines, and soundbites instead of full, messy sentences.
You measure experiences by whether they can be curated, shared, or validated.
And when something genuinely meaningful happens but doesn’t translate into content, a quiet disappointment creeps in.
Neuroscience is at work here, too. Your brain’s reward circuitry, those pesky dopamine spikes in the nucleus accumbens, lights up when a post earns likes, shares, or comments. And each hit reinforces a subtle behavioural pattern. You are being conditioned, slowly, to adapt not to the world or even your values, but to the system itself. This is operant conditioning dressed up as social media.
The scary part is that over time, the algorithm doesn’t just reflect who you are, it shapes who you become. Not dramatically, and not overnight, but slowly, and enough to change the contours of your attention, the edges of your personality, the way you react to other humans, and the way you measure your own self-worth. You’re still ‘you’, of course you are, but you’re a version of ‘you’ that’s been optimised for engagement, dopamine, and performative validation.
And like it or not, that version starts bleeding into real life.
Why it feels so empty, even when you’re ‘winning’
Maybe you’re one of the lucky ones that have done well; built a following, found your niche, and learned how to play the game without completely hating yourself. And from the outside, it looks like success. Likes, shares, comments, retweets, all the little digital applauses that tells the world you exist.
And yet … it still feels hollow.
That’s because narcissistic relationships are always draining.
They revolve around attention, not connection. Validation, not understanding. Performance, not presence.
You’re constantly feeding something that never feeds you back in the way you actually need. Every post, every story, every perfectly timed reaction is like tossing coins into a slot machine. The machine sometimes pays out numbers, notifications, bursts of approval, but none of it fills the empty spaces inside.
The algorithm can give you reach and make you visible in this world where everyone craves online attention, but it cannot give your life meaning, and it can’t make you whole. Because there’s no conversation, no shared humanity, and no messy, unpredictable life happening behind the screen … it’s just a mirror that smiles when you perform well, frowns when you falter, and never, ever hugs you back.
There’s also a neurological truth to this emptiness. Your brain gets hooked on these short-term reward loops: the spike of dopamine from likes, the novelty of new content, the hit of social validation. And over time, these chemical highs start to feel like life itself, but they’re shallow and fleeting. They train you to chase the next hit instead of cultivating depth. Even if your content ‘performs’, the satisfaction is always temporary. You may be winning in the metrics, but you’re definitely losing in the messy, meaningful stuff: intimacy, curiosity, patience, and self-knowledge.
And somewhere, underneath all of it, you feel it … that quiet, nagging sense that something essential is missing. That being seen is not the same as being understood, and being liked is not the same as being alive. Even when it looks like you’re winning, the gap between engagement and fulfilment never fully closes.
Drunk wisdom wrap-up
The crux of the matter is that the algorithm isn’t your enemy, but it’s definitely not your friend. It’s a narcissist in code, a mirror that rewards you for staring at yourself too long, until you forget there’s a world behind you. And the longer you stay locked in that reflection, the harder it gets to remember who you were before every thought, every feeling, every small revelation became content.
You don’t have to delete your accounts, move to a cabin in the woods, or start scribbling manifestos in notebooks you’ll inevitably lose under the couch. But you do have to remember that not every thought needs to be optimised, liked, or validated. Some thoughts are just thoughts, some ideas just need silence, some questions just need time to breathe, and some parts of you simply need to just exist without being watched, performing, or measured.
So, tonight, pour yourself a drink and step away from the mirror for a bit.
Call a friend without thinking about likes.
Read something challenging, uncomfortable, or just plain boring.
Sit with a thought long enough that it refuses to fit neatly into a post.
Just let yourself be unfinished, messy, and unapologetically unbranded. Notice friction … it’s often the only sign you’re still alive, still thinking, still human.
Laugh at the ridiculousness of it all. Curse at your phone, and feel the absurdity without trying to monetise or optimise it. And then, maybe tomorrow, scroll again, but with a little more awareness tucked behind your eyes, a reminder that you don’t owe the algorithm your soul, your attention, or your imagination.
Unfortunately, the feed will always be there, whispering, flattering, and feeding your reflection back at you. The trick is remembering that you exist outside of its mirrors. You can still stumble, still wonder, still be curious, still be you.
Now go question everything … especially the things that feel too perfectly tailored to you … and enjoy being gloriously, beautifully untamed in a world that wants to package you into neat, clickable chunks.
Cheers!
If you enjoyed reading this article, why not buy me a coffee on Ko-fi!